TapFirefox 3.5 Extensions

2 Jul 2009 06:12 by Rick

Rather quietly, certainly without the fanfare of version 3, Firefox 3.5 was released a couple of days ago.

This is an update to my earlier post about difficult extensions bringing the version numbers and locations up to date. There are still a few that I found that could be simply hacked to enable them to load. I haven’t altered the functionality at all, just changed the maximum version number to 3.* and tested them. They work on my system but you use them at your own risk on yours.

Stop-or-Reload Button 0.2.2 — The page says it works up to Firefox 3.0 (but it doesn’t even do that). The Hacked version 0.2.2.99 still works with Firefox 3.5.

UK Threat Level 0.16Hacked version 0.16.99

British English Dictionary 1.19 — The page says it works with Firefox 3.6 but it doesn’t. The Hacked version 1.19.99 still works with Firefox 3.5. This extension is also suitable for Thunderbird 2.*. It is not entirely clear if this dictionary is needed for Firefox 3+ or if there is one built into the English (British) basic download.

Google Pagerank Status 0.9.8 — Although the web site doesn’t say so, the version there is now 0.9.9 and does support Firefox 3 but not 3.5. Hacked version 0.9.9.99

Objection 0.3.3 doesn’t support Firefox 3.5 though they are working on a version 0.4. Hacked version 0.3.3.99

Minimize to Tray 0.0.1.2006102615+ (Windows) doesn’t work with Firefox 3 — The Hacked version 0.0.1.2006102615.99 also works with Thunderbird 2.*.

TapID Card Victory?

1 Jul 2009 14:05 by Rick

The Home Secretary, Alan Johnson, announced yesterday that there was to be a change in policy and that Identity Cards were no longer to be made compulsory for any UK Citizens. This would abandon the trial for air-side staff at airports. They would, however, become compulsory for foreign nationals and the voluntary scheme was to be speeded up.

Does this make sense? Not really, as foreign nationals should have their own passports anyway so an additional card won’t make a lot of difference. There may be more of a case for people who have “mislaid” their papers.

Is this a victory? Well, partially. It is a clear indications of a steady back-pedalling by the government on the policy. You can no longer be required to produce it if there is no requirement to have one. There will no longer be an issue with lost or damaged cards or fines for failure to register.

However, there was no mention of the back-room ID Register. This will remain and be populated with information from passport applications. There is no indication that the amount of information required here will be relaxed at all. A passport, in theory, is voluntary but, if they can argue that digital television and broadband access are essential for daily living, then I can hardly see that passports can be regarded as optional.

My old (pre-blog) article on the issues is still largely relevant and, of course, No2ID.

TapFor all the Saints

28 Jun 2009 22:20 by Rick

…who from their labours rest,

What a great start to an ordination service. After many years of study, finally the candidates have passed out to the satisfaction of their tutors and their bishops and they come together for that final blessing. The confirmation of their calling.

who thee by faith before the world confessed,

Many years ago they felt moved to talk to their vicar and subsequently put themselves forward for training. Braving selection boards and an interview with the, perhaps formidable figure, of their potential sending bishop. Now finally they can proclaim to the world that this is their life.

thy name, O Jesu, be for ever blest:

And this is what their life is all about; a deacon’s first duty is to proclaim the gospel for, traditionally, they are presented with only a New Testament (though today I noticed they were given a full Bible).

Alleluia, Alleluia! William Walsham How, 1864

We are thinking particularly, today, of the new Revds Tanya Lord and Dr. Caroline Yandell. It was a great service this morning in Bristol Cathedral. Starting with a sensitive welcome from Bishop Lee before breaking into the hymn above. Through the necessary formality of the ordination culminating in a standing ovation, followed by the controlled chaos of the peace. Then the Sanctus—a setting I haven’t heard before by Herbert Howells, sung gently by the girls choir which brought back the air of holiness to the whole proceeding. And at the end, an exit to a wonderfull sunny day for greetings, congratulations and photographs.

A grand day out.

TapGreen Dam Girl

25 Jun 2009 13:35 by Rick

Green Dam GirlChina’s latest move in the censorship of the internet is to require all new PCs to come preinstalled with nanny software known as Green Dam – Youth Escort. The intention is to “protect” their younger citizens from corruption by porn and other unwanted things like democracy and the Falun Gong. Like all nanny software, it fails by ignoring some things which it should stop and stops some things which no one can see any reason for. It has also been subverted by methods which are widely publicised and has become a laughing stock. What is new is the inventive way that they youth of China have expressed their contempt for the whole idea. They have come up with a manga style mascot to express their opinions which is known as Green Dam Girl. She comes in a variety of hand drawn versions but common themes are highly symbolic code features such as the can of paint to cover up filth, a degree of undress (some quite explicit or self censored), the toy rabbit which is the Green Dam software logo and the river crab badge which in Chinese is a pun on “harmony” which itself is a code word for censorship. This is my favourite but there are lots more if you look for them.

TapThe Ethics of Freecycle

23 Jun 2009 09:43 by Rick

If you are not familiar with it, let me introduce Freecycle. It is a method of disposing of unwanted gear that is either not saleable or you can’t be bothered to try and get money for. The principle is quite straight forward—one member offers something, other members take up that offer and arrange to collect the goods. As it says in their introduction, “It’s all about reuse and keeping good stuff out of landfills.” The types of things that are offered vary from old mowers, computers, hi-fi and household goods right down to one I saw yesterday which was two boxes of cereal which they discovered no one in the family liked.

Some local admins, however, have been suggesting that you shouldn’t take up the first offers but wait and pick what seems to you to be the most deserving cause. This has come about as a result of complaints that people are picking up stuff for free and then selling it on by local ads or eBay and making a profit out of the system. There is certainly evidence that some people will bid for anything that looks like it is worth a bob or two.

My reaction is “good for them.” If I can’t be bothered to sell the stuff then why shouldn’t they. I have achieved my objective and got rid of it. It doesn’t end up on the city dump and someone else is using it, whether they had to pay for it or not. These people are filling the vacant role of the rag-and-bone man. I have been disposing of some potentially quite high value stuff but which is not easy to sell—vintage hi-fi and computer gear. This generally attracts a lot of bidders and my only criteria is that if you bid quickly then you must collect quickly, or at least confirm a collection date. If I don’t get a confirmation response within 24 hours then I move down the list.

If your objective is charity then I suggest you give your goods to a charity shop, if they will take it. But Freecycle is not about that, it is only concerned with re-cycling.

TapFacebook Regional Networks

22 Jun 2009 10:56 by Rick

Facebook have announced that, over the next few weeks, they will be discontinuing the system of regional networks. These are the ones based on countries, states, cities – so, for instance, I am in a network for “Bristol.”

Ever since I joined (only a few months ago) they have been next to useless. What is the point in suggesting that such-and-such a person also lives in Bristol and perhaps I know them?

The bad news is that, when they remove them, your privacy profiles will change. All the permissions that used to say “My Networks and Friends” will be automatically changed to “Everyone” which may not be (probably won’t be) what you would like. So go into Settings ==> Privacy Settings now and change them. Educational and Work networks will remain so you can connect to and use those instead, though saying I should know everyone who ever went to Bristol University is just as daft.

TapSkip Scavengers

21 Jun 2009 18:29 by Rick

If you are one of these people (like me) who can’t pass a skip without peering in to see if there is something useful, then now is the time to walk the streets of the student district in your town. It is incredible what they throw away come the end of the year. Either it doesn’t fit in daddy’s Volvo or gets left behind for the landlord to chuck out. This weekend is going down time in Bristol (other Universities may vary). Do the council (and the environment) a service and pick up the useful looking things. If you don’t want them, put them on Freecycle.

TapMacOS with Safari 4

17 Jun 2009 11:30 by Rick

This is a companion post to the previous one about Windows without Internet Explorer, which now seems to be possible.

It has been discovered that, once you install Safari 4 on MacOS, you cannot remove it. The only backwards route is to reinstall the operating system from scratch. This is a seriously BAD THING. Microsoft got a lot of stick for embedding IE deep into Windows so it could not be removed (possibly not deliberately, but as a consequence). There are many reasons that you may wish to remove an application—shortage of space is only one. It was possible to remove the Beta versions so why not the real thing? It is possible to remove Safari from Windows.

TapWindows without IE

15 Jun 2009 10:45 by Rick

There is some talk around about Microsoft issuing a special version of Windows 7 for EU countries which doesn’t have Internet Explorer bundled in.

In some senses, this is good news; it exposes the lie that Internet Explorer cannot be removed from Windows because its use is deeply embedded into the operating system. It also means that Windows Update will have to be able to work with alternative browsers (or another mechanism altogether); something it can’t do at the moment.

On the other hand, I don’t see why they need to ship without it at all. Potentially the machines become useless for the average consumer who can’t access the web even to download a browser to access the web! There are suggestions that Microsoft are just posturing.

Apple ships machines with Safari which is a very similar situation so I don’t see why Windows shouldn’t ship with IE—so long as it is possible to remove it if people don’t want it. In practice, I don’t remove Safari, I just don’t use it except for cross browser code checks, and it would be the same with IE; but it would be nice to know that I could. A similar situation should exist for Media Player/iTunes verses competitors.

TapFacebook Privacy

11 Jun 2009 08:59 by Rick

I trust that those of you who have signed up for Facebook (and other similar) accounts have looked carefully at all the options and have decided who should be able to see what aspects of your profile. I also hope that you only accept as friends people that you really know in the “real world,” because “friend” status gives them greater access to your profile and access to your other friends. This can be misused to create a false web of trust.

Yet I see a surprising number of dubious applications, polls and quizzes come up on my wall. When you first connect to one of these, whether as an active initiator or in a response to a friend’s invitation you are presented with an acceptance screen headed “Allow Access?” and it clearly says

Allowing <whatever application> access will let it access your Profile information, photos, your friends’ info and other content that it requires to work.

Read it again until it sinks in—not only are you giving the application access to your profile which you have carefully edited but also access to those of your friends who may not have been so careful. Think of it as handing over your address book, birthday book and diary. You can see this happening when you are in some applications; the profile photos of your friends pop up suggesting that you invite them to join in.

The Facebook terms of service, which the application writers are supposed to adhere to, is quite clear that this information can only be used for the purposes it was given (like the example above) but do you suppose that they all stick to this. A recent study at the University of Cambridge (sorry, article rather technical) reveals that quite often the information is passed on to advertisers and from there, who knows where it goes. It becomes quite easy for a third party to collect a dossier of inter-relationships and enough personal information to, for instance, crack commonly used passwords.

So now you know why I haven’t responded to many of these invitations—so far only two that I trust and one daft one before I realised what the implications were.

And how much do you trust Facebook itself. If you use it at all then you have to, and in most cases this should be ok. There would be a terrific scandal if it was found to be deliberately misusing its customers information. Yet there are some strange things going on. Early on I took advantage of the offer to scan my email address book for possible friends. I did this very carefully and selected only those that I wanted to invite for follow up. Yet I am still, some months later, being invited to add some of the others as friends; it still knows that I am acquainted with them even though I didn’t initially add them to my friends list. It is in my dossier somewhere!