TapGoogle Chrome – success

4 Sep 2008 12:31 by Rick

Well, I got it up and running and fine it looks too. A bit dodgy around the edges but it is a Google Beta (what the rest of the world calls an Alpha release) and still a development project so we can’t criticise.

What I actually want to say here is much deeper. It must be noted that Google are not designing a new browser. The market is already full of those IE? (pick a number from 5 to 8), Firefox, Safari, Opera… Chrome certainly should be a good browser and proposes some interesting features. But, no, what Google is promoting here is a platform; a base on which they can build their web applications that they have developed over the years and will be continuing in the future—Search, gMail, Calendar, and more. So far they have been dependent on the browsers and those, without exception, have had weaknesses in areas that Google needs to succeed.

For example, we know that occasionally any browser will lock up. The developers try hard to fix them but they still do it. Google are in the business of supplying all your needs via web applications so can’t afford for the browser to crash. They are not saying that Chrome will be immune from this problem but that a lock caused by one site will not crash out the whole browser, just that window.

When you look at it this way, Google are putting themselves right into competition with system suppliers like Microsoft and Apple, but Google are doing it via the web where the others do it on the hardware. What Chrome does is bring the interface under their control. This will allow kiosk like devices (thin clients) where, as far as the user is aware, the operating system is the browser. All services are obtained remotely; the closest we have got to network computing since the idea was mooted.

TapGoogle Chrome – no luck on first try

3 Sep 2008 10:20 by Rick

The talk on the web is about the first completely new browser for over a decade (I think). Designed from a blank sheet it promises to be popular, emphasising speed and reliability over features. Only a Windows version is available at the moment but I found that I couldn’t even download it from my Mac, it must be doing some platform detection. I will try again tonight after firing up my VM.

TapAlphabet spamming

2 Sep 2008 10:46 by Rick

I have often wondered why, when all other things are equal, some people get more spam than others. Perhaps this is the answer. We know about dictionary spamming—that is trying every possible name before the @ on common (and uncommon) email servers. What seems to be happening is that this process is partially optimised so that more popular starting letters, ones that have more genuine accounts, are tried before less popular ones. So if your name starts with r, p, m or s then you will get more spam than if your name starts with q, w, y or z. It seems that it would be a good idea, if you have to change your account name, rather than become rick325@hotmail to try yyyrick or xyzzy.

TapOmnivores

24 Aug 2008 12:57 by Rick

I am not big on memes but this one struck a chord. I will need to look a few of these up as they may be different names than we would use.

The Food tasting meme

  1. Copy this list into your blog or journal, including these instructions.
  2. Bold all the items you’ve eaten.
  3. Cross out any items that you would never consider eating (or eating again)
  4. Optional extra: Post a comment http://www.verygoodtaste.co.uk linking to your results.

To make the filling out of this form and generating the HTML for it a bit easier, [info]reddywhp has played around with some PHP. Go to http://reddywhip.org/lj/foods/ and fill it out there. After filling it out, you will be given the code to copy and paste into your blog.

Livejournal users, remember to use your LJ-Cuts!

  1. Venison
  2. Nettle tea
  3. Huevos rancheros
  4. Steak tartare (accidentally not knowing what it was; it was good though)
  5. Crocodile
  6. Black pudding (regularly)
  7. Cheese fondue (in the mid ’70s when it was fashionable)
  8. Carp
  9. Borscht (in a great restaurant called the “Borscht and Tears” in Knightsbridge in the early ’70s before we were married)
  10. Baba ghanoush
  11. Calamari (often)
  12. Phở
  13. Peanut Butter & Jelly sandwich
  14. Aloo gobi
  15. Hot dog from a street cart
  16. Epoisses
  17. Black truffle
  18. Fruit wine made from something other than grapes
  19. Steamed pork buns (Dim Sum)
  20. Pistachio ice cream
  21. Heirloom tomatoes
  22. Fresh wild berries (straight off the bush)
  23. Foie gras
  24. Rice and beans
  25. Brawn, or head cheese
  26. Raw Scotch Bonnet pepper (Wow!)
  27. Dulce de leche
  28. Oysters (good in Steak and Oyster pie but not raw)
  29. Baklava
  30. Bagna cauda
  31. Wasabi peas
  32. Clam chowder in a sourdough bowl
  33. Salted lassi (once in a genuine curry house in Luton)
  34. Sauerkraut
  35. Root beer float
  36. Cognac with a fat cigar
  37. Clotted cream tea (in Cornwall of course)
  38. Vodka jelly
  39. Gumbo
  40. Oxtail (shame it is hard to come by now)
  41. Curried goat
  42. Whole insects
  43. Phaal
  44. Goat’s milk
  45. Malt whisky from a bottle worth $120 or more
  46. Fugu
  47. Chicken tikka masala
  48. Eel (and Elvers)
  49. Krispy Kreme original glazed doughnut
  50. Sea urchin
  51. Prickly pear
  52. Umeboshi
  53. Abalone
  54. Paneer
  55. McDonald’s Big Mac Meal
  56. Spaetzle (in Austria)
  57. Dirty gin martini
  58. Beer above 8% ABV (Belgium of course)
  59. Poutine
  60. Carob chips
  61. S’mores
  62. Sweetbreads
  63. Kaolin (a bit of a cheat this one; Kaolin and Morphine is/was a popular remedy for an upset stomach)
  64. Currywurst
  65. Durian
  66. Frog’s Legs (it recently came as part of a set menu in France)
  67. Beignets, churros, elephant ears or funnel cake
  68. Haggis (Och aye)
  69. Fried plantain (I can’t remember how we discovered them but they are a favourite now)
  70. Chitterlings or andouillette
  71. Gazpacho
  72. Caviar and blini
  73. Louche absinthe
  74. Gjetost or brunost
  75. Roadkill
  76. Baijiu
  77. Hostess Fruit Pie (this seems to be similar to the Lyon’s fruit pies that you could/can get in the UK with a sweet and sugar dusted pastry. If so, I love them)
  78. Snail (you taste nothing but the garlic)
  79. Lapsang souchong
  80. Bellini
  81. Tom yum
  82. Eggs Benedict
  83. Pocky
  84. Tasting menu at a three-Michelin-star restaurant
  85. Kobe beef
  86. Hare (jugged by my grandmother; watch out for the lead shot)
  87. Goulash
  88. Flowers (mostly used as garnish)
  89. Horse
  90. Criollo chocolate
  91. Spam
  92. Soft shell crab
  93. Rose harissa
  94. Catfish (sold under various names so I may have had it)
  95. Mole poblano
  96. Bagel and lox
  97. Lobster Thermidor
  98. Polenta
  99. Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee
  100. Snake

TapP****d off

21 Aug 2008 15:59 by Rick

First a warning—LADIES, this post is not for you. You don’t have the problem, so move on to another post, there are plenty of interesting ones further down.

Right—I hate urinals! I refuse to use them unless there is nothing else and I am bursting to go. Why? Next time you need to use one, try this experiment. Do your business as usual and when you have zipped/buttoned up take one pace backwards. Now take both hands and rub them up the inside of your trouser legs from knee to groin. Now wash your hands because you certainly need to.

The problem is a fine mist splash-back, even with my late middle age feeble stream. I don’t know of any solution so I always use a cubicle. It is a shame that is uses far too much water; few have the water saving half flush as they think you are in there for “bigger things”.

TapSonos – one year on

20 Aug 2008 13:07 by Rick

I wrote nearly a year ago of our move into whole house audio with the Sonos system. It has been a great success and is in use every day. We use it for the radio news in the mornings, dinner time music in the evenings and background music for parties. We now have over 50GB of music stored which consists of 99% of all the CDs we own, 80% of the cassette tapes and I am making good progress digitising the vinyl records.

Some things have changed with new models—we applaud the company for keeping them 100% compatible with the previous range. They now have the ZP90 which upgrades the ZP80 to 802.11n wireless with its longer range. The ZP100 has been replaced by the ZP120 which is smaller and with (reportedly) a better quality amplifier but reduces it to two wired network ports and loses the analogue line out sockets. The software updates have sligtly increased the index capacity and introduced various streaming music services (which we don’t use). The BR100 bridge solves the problem of the cost of the network attachment, but there have been no earth shattering advances.

So what is the future. Well for us it will be getting another node for the bedroom when we redecorate soon. But for Sonos, where will they go next. As you would expect, the forum members have a lot of ideas ranging from minor tweaks to the user interface, through a modernised controller to full video streaming capabilities.

In my opinion there is one thing that stands out as deficient and will be affecting sales. That is the need to have a raft of non-Sonos equipment behind the scenes to support it. These include a broadband connected network (not necessarily wireless); network attached disk storage for the music, either NAS or a computer; a computer with CD drive to transfer stuff to disk and also to manage the library adding titles, artists, album art etc. To some extent this is true of other devices such as portable MP3 players but these integrate very closely into computer media players; iPod with iTunes and most others with Windows Media Player; the storage is in the device. Loading is just a matter of drag-and-drop.

When I wrote about this last time I suggested a collaboration with an existing NAS supplier and leaving the ripping and management alone. This may still be the best way but could be enhanced by “arranging” for the media players to recognise the Sonos system in the same way that they see portable players. However! I see that some other manufacturers have gone the whole way and provide truly integrated servers.

Naim Audio have leapt into the market in a big way (and very very expensive). They are offering most of the Sonos benefits (claiming some as firsts) plus some extra features; an integrated storage/rip station server; synchronisation of libraries across the internet (so your country cottage has the same library as your city apartment—at this price, these are the customers they want); 24bit audiophile capability; integrated DAB/FM tuners, multiple line-in facilities; and integration of portable MP3 players, though I am not sure all of these are actually available yet. Of course this is way out of the market for mortals, the basic HDX server is £4,500 and you would be looking at £25,000+ and installed by professionals for a full house system. Still, there are ideas there that Sonos could pick up… (what is curious is that the controller looks like a 1970’s computer screen!)

At a more modest cost, Sony GigaJuke and Philips Streamium offer music servers. These are Middle-Fi systems but are simple and cheap so will capture the mass market. Are Sonos happy to let this go? I want to come in from the shop, slide a disk into the slot and play it NOW.

TapSelfish Web

19 Aug 2008 09:41 by Rick

While reading the article in the New York Times linked by my previous post I noticed that there wasn’t a single link out for more information—not even the author’s blog was linked. By coincidence, the very next article I read from my daily RSS feed review was the web guru Tim O’Reilly on a very similar topic. That is that many web sites prefer to link to other articles or even just searches on their own site rather than more informative links to the outside world. Traditional news providers are bad for this but he notes that even search engines are beginning to provide information rather than link to it.

The web grew great on links—to continue it still needs those links.

TapWine boxes

09:07 by Rick

There is an interesting article in the New York Times which starts by saying that Italy is allowing its quality controlled wines (their equivalent of AOC) to be sold in boxes. It goes on to say that, for ecological reasons, the rest of the world should do the same and the only hindrance so far has been the general poor quality of the wines that are boxed. It is an interesting idea that itches slightly, but I can see the point. The only thing that I would dispute is the statement that “all but a relative handful of the top wines from around the world” don’t need to age. Most wines need to age but “how long?” will determine if a box is a practical container during that time.

TapHot stuff

18 Aug 2008 14:24 by Rick

As we had a surplus of loyalty points I splashed out on an MP3 player the other day. Not wanting an overpriced iPod I got the Samsung YP-T10 which does everything I need and has 4GB of memory and Bluetooth. I have not figured out the latter yet but can load the music from my Mac with a third party application XNJB.

The controls on this device (apart from the on/off switch) are a touch pad which is heat rather than pressure sensitive. So it works from your fingers but not hard objects in your pocket or knocks. Putting it in my shirt top pocket I find that it keeps cutting out—it is clearly warm in there and the “little bumps on my chest” …

I will have to put it in the pocket control side out!

TapMount network drive at login (Mac)

9 Aug 2008 07:46 by Rick

It has taken a while to figure out how to do this from suggestions that it can’t be done (daft) to using a login time script. As you would expect it is all very easy.

First mount it from the finder by hand. Then go to System Preferences > Accounts > Your Login > Login Items. Select the + to add a new item and navigate the to share you want mounted. Done.

^ Top